Assessing the True Cost of Tail Spend, Part 2

By Corcentric | August 29, 2019
About Corcentric

Using teams and technology to take culprit spend issues by the tail.

In Part One of this two-part blog series from our colleague Reggie Peterson, Director of Supply Programs at Corcentric, he explored the (considerable) list of challenges facing procurement in regards to controlling the tail-spending mavericks and rogues who cost companies significant amounts of money. In Part Two, he takes a closer look at another component of the problem —being “oversuppliered” — and digs into the measures and strategies available to get more spend under control.

Too many vendors means too many issues

Look at your vendor list. Are there too many falling under these low-value, non-recurring transactions? Could you consolidate these vendors to create a smaller list of preferred vendors?

Doing so would not only reduce the number of vendors; it would also give you greater leverage since you would be able to offer a greater volume of purchases to the vendors chosen.

There are a number of problems that follow with too many vendors:

  • The possibility that many suppliers may not fall under the preferred list, meaning they may not meet company standards and KPIs.
  • Too many transactions which translate to too many invoices and ultimately higher costs and too much time spent by employees approving and paying these invoices.
  • When so much time is spent with so many suppliers for so many low-value purchases, your most important resource…your people…are strained and underutilized for more strategic tasks.
  • Savings are lost when lower volume per vendor means less possibility for early pay discounts.

Put simply: if two-thirds or more of your suppliers supply only five percent of spend; if less than 70 percent of orders are negotiated by procurement; and if fewer than 50 percent of transactions are with preferred suppliers, then you have a tail spend problem.

Use teams and technology to gain control over your tail spend.

There are two issues that create the problem to begin with. First, a low priority for indirect spend management within the business is the most commonly cited impediment to organizational management of that spend. This problem is closely followed by the organization lacking resources to effectively source indirect programs. And this stems from the fact that for still too many organizations, procurement is looked upon as a tactical, not a strategic function.

In order to gain control over tail spend, procurement must follow certain steps:

  • Identify uncontrolled spend areas
  • Create a plan to prioritize and address those areas
  • Assemble a budget
  • Appoint someone within procurement to oversee that budget
  • Select suppliers that suit your corporate goals (and your customers)
  • Negotiate contracts
  • Process all procurement through a single, streamlined payment portal

A procurement team should be tasked with managing and controlling tail spend. But the ability to do that is hampered if you do not avail yourself of automation technology. Automation addresses an organization’s inability to capture and quantify the multitude of purchases that are made every day, both direct and indirect. Companies can waste hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars annually on uncontrolled tail spend; however, work stream-specific automation solutions can reduce noncompliant purchases by up to 90 percent.

Without automated, electronic indirect spend controls in place, purchases can’t be efficiently monitored. As a result, there is no means of quality control and measurement. Plus, due to the nature of the purchases, delivery is usually not captured in your ERP system and key data that could be used in forecasting and analytics isn’t generated.

Technology will also help in negotiating supplier contracts as all parties will have visibility into contract terms and pricing. That will not only add accuracy, it will eliminate time-eating disputes over late payments and exceptions. An automated solution should also include an analytics function that will enable procurement to look directly into purchasing and deliver actionable intelligence on organizational deficiencies.

When it comes to spend control, don’t let the tail wag the dog
Read the Report

“I can save HOW MUCH?”

Visibility, accuracy, control: in the end, it all boils down to dollars and cents. And those dollar figures are impressive when you implement automated, paperless processes and well-negotiated contracts. The Hackett Group estimates that by managing tail spend better, companies can realize an average savings of 7.1 percent. Even a 5 percent savings on tail spend can be the equivalent of a 10 percent increase in net profit. It’s time to gain control over your tail spend. This is one tail that you don’t want wagging your company’s profits.

To learn more about tail spend and how to control it, download our P2P 101 Guide. It goes into some detail about the root causes, and offers up additional strategies for how to deal with it.

If you’d like to see first-hand how technology plays a key role in establishing more spend control and helps solve a range of other source-to-pay business challenges, contact us for a personalized demonstration of the integrated, modular solutions on the Corcentric Platform.

Featured Resource:
Webinar: How to Develop a Plan for Mitigating the Risk of Payment Fraud

Mitigating the Risk of Payment Fraud

An important discussion on the post-pandemic rise in payment fraud and how to develop a plan for preventing it.
Watch Now

Subscribe to our blog for more thought leadership pieces like this one.